Annesley Woodhouse Crime Rate July 2024 | Monthly Statistics

The crime profile for Annesley Woodhouse in July 2024 reveals a distinct emphasis on interpersonal crime over property-related offences. With a total crime rate of 6.2 per 1,000 residents—26.2% below the UK average of 8.4—the area demonstrates a markedly lower incidence of theft and burglary compared to national trends. Violence and sexual offences dominate the crime mix, accounting for 48.5% of all reported incidents, followed by anti-social behaviour (21.2%) and public order issues (12.1%). This distribution suggests a focus on community-level conflicts rather than commercial or residential property crime, which aligns with the area’s character as a built-up residential district within Ashfield. Seasonal factors likely play a role, as July’s peak summer period typically correlates with increased social activity, outdoor events, and festivals. While the overall rate remains below UK averages, the proportion of violence and sexual offences is higher than expected for a small built-up area, potentially reflecting local dynamics such as community cohesion challenges or policing priorities. The relatively low rates of shoplifting (3.0%) and burglary (3.0%) compared to UK averages may indicate effective community engagement strategies or a lower density of retail and high-traffic zones. This crime mix illustrates an area where interpersonal disputes and anti-social behaviour are more prevalent than traditional property crime, a pattern often seen in smaller, tightly knit communities with strong local networks. However, the absence of significant spikes in property-related offences contrasts with typical urban crime profiles, suggesting that Annesley Woodhouse’s crime profile is shaped by factors distinct from larger metropolitan areas.

July 2024 saw notable shifts in crime patterns, including a 100% increase in shoplifting and burglary, both rising from zero to one incident each. This suggests a potential seasonal vulnerability, possibly linked to increased foot traffic during summer festivals or events. Conversely, criminal damage and arson fell by 66.7% compared to the previous month, a decline that may reflect improved community monitoring or reduced opportunities for such offences during warmer weather. The category of drugs offences, which rose to 2 incidents (0.4 per 1,000 residents), was 82% above the UK average of 0.2 per 1,000, indicating a localised issue that warrants further attention. Meanwhile, violence and sexual offences remained high, with 16 incidents (3.0 per 1,000) compared to the UK average of 2.9 per 1,000, suggesting that interpersonal crime remains a persistent challenge. The balance between violent and property crime also shifted slightly, with violent crime comprising 48.5% of total incidents compared to property-related offences (12.1%), a ratio that diverges from the UK average where property crime typically accounts for a larger share. For residents, the 100% increase in shoplifting may signal a need for heightened awareness in local retail areas during peak summer months, though the overall crime rate remains comfortably below national levels.

The crime rate in July 2024 (6.2 per 1,000) represents a 3.2% increase from the previous month’s rate of 6.0 per 1,000, a modest upward trend that may reflect seasonal fluctuations in social activity. On a daily basis, Annesley Woodhouse experienced approximately one crime per day during July, a figure that contextualises the pace of incidents within the local community. When scaled to the area’s population of 5,322 residents, this translates to one reported crime occurring for every 161 residents over the course of the month—a monthly exposure rate that is significantly lower than the UK average, which typically sees one crime for every 120 residents. This suggests that residents of Annesley Woodhouse are statistically less likely to experience crime than the national average. The area’s relatively low property crime rates (shoplifting, burglary, and criminal damage all below UK averages) contrast with the higher proportion of violent and sexual offences, which may reflect local demographic characteristics or policing strategies. While the monthly exposure rate is a useful metric for understanding risk, it does not account for the varying severity or impact of different crime types. For instance, the higher incidence of violence and sexual offences, though numerically lower than UK averages in some categories, may have a more pronounced effect on community well-being. This comparison underscores the importance of considering both the quantity and type of crime when assessing safety, as Annesley Woodhouse’s profile differs meaningfully from the UK average.