Ashfield Crime Rate February 2026 | Monthly Statistics

For every 1,000 residents in Ashfield, 7.4 crimes were reported in February 2026—a rate 15.6% higher than the UK average of 6.4 per 1,000. This translates to one reported crime occurring for roughly every 135 residents over the course of the month. The most significant contributors to this rate were violence and sexual offences (36.5% of all crimes), anti-social behaviour (19.2%), and shoplifting (12.0%). These figures sit 16% and 54% above UK averages respectively, highlighting a distinct pattern in local crime dynamics. While February is typically a low-activity month due to winter conditions, Ashfield’s data suggests that indoor spaces and community hubs may be experiencing heightened tensions. Violence and sexual offences, in particular, are 2.7 per 1,000 in Ashfield compared to the UK’s 2.3 per 1,000, indicating a need for targeted interventions in areas where social interactions are frequent. The seasonal context of February—a pre-spring lull—may be influencing these patterns. Anti-social behaviour, which is 54% above the UK average, could be linked to the area’s mix of residential and commercial zones, where noise complaints and public disturbances are more common. Meanwhile, shoplifting rates are 55% above the UK average, reflecting the presence of high-footfall retail areas that remain active even in winter. These statistics underscore the importance of understanding how local geography and demographics intersect with crime trends, even during months traditionally associated with lower outdoor activity.

February 2026 saw a 37.5% increase in robbery rates, rising from 16 to 22 incidents. This sharp jump in violent crime contrasts with a 46.8% drop in vehicle crime, which fell from 47 to 25 cases—a shift that may reflect seasonal changes in outdoor activity. Anti-social behaviour, the second most common crime, was 54% above the UK average, with 184 incidents recorded. This category’s prevalence could be linked to the area’s density of residential and commercial properties, where noise complaints and public disturbances are more likely. Meanwhile, burglary rates fell by 45.2% compared to January, declining from 62 to 34 cases. This decrease might be attributed to reduced foot traffic during winter. The breakdown also reveals that Ashfield’s rate for violence and sexual offences is 16% above the UK average, with 350 incidents recorded. This figure, while lower than January’s 332, still indicates a persistent challenge in addressing violent crime in the district. For residents, the most immediately relevant statistic is the 37.5% rise in robbery, which suggests a need for heightened awareness in areas with high pedestrian traffic, such as town centres or transport hubs.

Ashfield’s February 2026 crime rate of 7.4 per 1,000 residents marked an 11.3% decrease from the previous month’s 8.3 per 1,000. This decline, while notable, still leaves the area 15.6% above the UK average. On a daily basis, Ashfield experienced approximately 34 crimes per day in February, a figure that, while not immediately intuitive, provides a tangible sense of the frequency of incidents. Over the course of the month, one reported crime occurred for every 135 residents—a ratio that underscores the scale of exposure for individuals living in the district. When compared to the UK average, Ashfield’s residents face a higher risk of encountering anti-social behaviour, shoplifting, and violence than the national average, though they are less likely to experience vehicle crime or theft from the person. This contrast highlights the unique challenges of Ashfield, where community-centric spaces may contribute to higher rates of interpersonal crime. The population context is also critical: with 129,572 residents, the absolute number of crimes (958) must be balanced against the local context of urban density and social infrastructure. While the month-on-month decline is encouraging, the persistent gap between Ashfield’s rates and the UK average suggests that targeted measures may be needed to address specific vulnerabilities in the district.