Goldthorpe Crime Rate February 2026 | Monthly Statistics

Goldthorpe’s crime profile in February 2026 reveals a stark contrast between property and violent crime, with property offences dominating the landscape. The overall crime rate of 9.4 per 1,000 residents places the area 46.9% above the UK average of 6.4, highlighting a significant divergence from national trends. Property crimes accounted for 56.7% of all reported incidents (38 out of 67), with burglary and vehicle crime forming the largest share. Violent crime, though lower in volume, still represented 25.4% of total incidents, with violence and sexual offences being the most prevalent category. This imbalance may partly explain the area’s elevated rate compared to the UK, as property crime often reflects broader socioeconomic factors, such as housing instability or economic hardship. Seasonal context suggests that February’s low outdoor activity and pre-spring lull could have influenced patterns, reducing opportunities for violent crime but leaving property crimes vulnerable to targeted activity. The UK comparison for burglary—860% above the national average—underscores a localised issue that deserves closer attention, linked to the area’s built-up nature and limited spatial dispersion of residences. While direct causation, the dominance of property crime may indicate a need for targeted interventions in high-risk areas or times.

February 2026 saw dramatic shifts in Goldthorpe’s crime mix, with property crime far outpacing violent crime. Vehicle crime surged by 400% (from 1 to 5 incidents), and burglary skyrocketed by 325% (from 4 to 17), reflecting a sharp focus on property-related offences. Conversely, violence and sexual offences dropped by 46.9%, and criminal damage and arson fell by 40%, suggesting a possible seasonal reduction in public disorder or a shift in criminal priorities. These changes contrast with the UK average for burglary, which is 860% below Goldthorpe’s rate, highlighting a localised vulnerability. Anti-social behaviour also rose sharply (166.7%), potentially tied to increased indoor activity during winter months. For residents, the 400% increase in vehicle crime is a notable warning, as it indicates a sudden spike in targeted thefts that could affect households with parked vehicles. The UK comparison for public order offences (27% below the national average) adds nuance, suggesting that Goldthorpe’s violent crime trends may be influenced by specific local dynamics rather than broader national patterns. This month’s data underscores the need for tailored strategies addressing property crime while monitoring the reasons behind the decline in violent incidents.

Goldthorpe’s crime rate in February 2026 (9.4 per 1,000) marked a 2.9% decrease from the previous month’s rate of 9.7, indicating a slight but measurable trend. On a daily basis, the area recorded roughly 2 crimes per day over the 28-day period, a figure that, while localised, provides context for residents assessing their risk. Monthly exposure shows that, over the course of February, one reported crime occurred for every 107 residents, a ratio that, when compared to the area’s population of 7,137, illustrates the frequency of incidents within a small community. This statistic may help residents gauge their likelihood of being directly affected by crime, though the rate does not account for unreported incidents. The population-scaled perspective also highlights the disproportionate impact of certain crime types, such as burglary, which is 860% above the UK average. This disparity suggests that Goldthorpe’s built-up environment, with its concentration of housing, may contribute to higher property crime rates compared to more spread-out rural areas. The 2.9% monthly decline, while modest, could reflect short-term factors such as weather patterns or local initiatives, but without further data, it remains difficult to determine the exact cause. Residents may find value in understanding these figures as part of a broader context, using them to inform personal safety measures or community discussions.