Silsden Crime Rate September 2025 | Monthly Statistics

For an area of 8,794 residents, 56 crimes reported in September 2025 translates to one reported crime for every 157 residents over the course of the month. This rate of 6.4 per 1,000 residents places Silsden 13.5% below the UK average of 7.4 per 1,000, a difference that aligns with broader patterns observed in smaller built-up areas within West Yorkshire. The crime profile in Silsden shows a clear dominance of violent crime, with violence and sexual offences accounting for 44.6% of all reported incidents—nearly double the share contributed by property crimes (25.0% from anti-social behaviour and 8.9% from vehicle crime). This imbalance contrasts with the UK national picture, where property crime typically outpaces violent crime. The seasonal context of September, marked by the return to school and university freshers' week, may likely contribute to heightened anti-social behaviour and incidents involving alcohol. Vehicle crime remains a persistent concern in Silsden, with a rate of 0.6 per 1,000 residents—50% above the UK average. This could be consistent with the area’s proximity to major transport routes or the presence of car parks in local retail zones. The low rates of shoplifting and public order offences, both 84% and 81% below UK averages respectively, suggest a relatively stable community environment, though this may also reflect underreporting in less densely populated areas. Overall, the crime picture in Silsden appears to be shaped by a combination of local demographics and seasonal rhythms, with a focus on interpersonal conflicts and vehicle-related incidents rather than property crime.

September 2025 saw significant fluctuations in specific crime categories, with other theft rising 300% (from 1 to 4 incidents) and anti-social behaviour increasing by 75% (from 8 to 14). These jumps suggest a potential shift in criminal activity patterns, though whether this reflects increased reporting or actual spikes in incidents. Conversely, public order offences fell sharply by 80% (from 5 to 1), and criminal damage and arson dropped by 50% (from 2 to 1), which may align with the typical decline in outdoor activities as nights draw in. The breakdown of crime types reveals a stark contrast with the UK average: while violence and sexual offences in Silsden are 9% above the national rate, shoplifting and public order offences are 84% and 81% below, respectively. This divergence could be explained by the area’s relatively low tourism footprint and the absence of high-footfall retail hubs that typically drive such crimes. The rate of vehicle crime—0.6 per 1,000 residents—remains a local concern, as it is 50% above the UK average. This may be partly explained by Silsden’s location near key transport corridors or the presence of commuter parking facilities. For residents, the most immediate takeaway is the 300% increase in other theft, which could include burglary, fraud, or other non-violent crimes, and may warrant heightened awareness of personal security measures.

The crime rate in Silsden for September 2025 (6.4 per 1,000 residents) is virtually unchanged from the previous month (6.3 per 1,000), reflecting a 1.9% increase that is statistically stable. This consistency suggests that the overall crime environment in the area has not experienced dramatic shifts, though localized changes in specific categories are evident. On a daily basis, Silsden recorded approximately 2 crimes per day in September, a figure that, while modest, underscores the regularity of criminal activity in a small built-up area. When scaled to the population, the monthly exposure of 1 crime per 157 residents highlights the relatively low frequency of incidents compared to larger urban centres, where crime rates are often higher. This proportion is particularly notable given Silsden’s position within Bradford, a city with historically higher crime rates. The comparison to the UK average also reveals that while Silsden is safer than the national average overall, it faces unique challenges in certain categories—most vehicle crime and anti-social behaviour, which are both significantly above UK rates. This may reflect local factors such as the area’s transport infrastructure or community dynamics, which differ from the broader UK context. For residents, the key takeaway is that while the overall crime rate remains stable, targeted attention to categories like anti-social behaviour and vehicle crime could help maintain this relatively low level of criminal activity.