Rural Breckland Crime Rate November 2025 | Monthly Statistics

For a population of 26,781, the 78 crimes reported in November 2025 equate to a crime rate of 2.9 per 1,000 residents—60.3% below the UK average of 7.3 per 1,000. This figure, while modest, reflects the area’s rural character, where crime rates are typically lower than in urban centres. The breakdown shows that violence and sexual offences accounted for 57.7% of all incidents, followed by criminal damage and arson at 14.1% and public order offences at 7.7%. These patterns align with seasonal factors, such as darker evenings and the timing of local events, which may contribute to the higher proportion of violent crimes. The UK average for violence and sexual offences is 2.6 per 1,000, meaning Rural Breckland’s rate is 34% below the national average. However, the area’s rate for possession of weapons is 43% above the UK average, a significant anomaly that may warrant further analysis. The relatively low rates of property crimes, such as burglary and vehicle crime, which are 67% and 75% below the UK average respectively, are consistent with the rural landscape, where fewer commercial hubs and lower population density reduce opportunities for such offences. The seasonal context of November, with its shorter daylight hours and the proximity of Bonfire Night, may have influenced the increase in violent crimes, as darker conditions can extend the window for criminal activity. Additionally, the sharp decline in anti-social behaviour, which fell by 83.3% from 6 to 1, suggests that local initiatives or community engagement efforts may have had a measurable impact. The overall picture underscores the importance of contextualising crime data within both local and national trends, as well as considering the unique characteristics of the rural environment.

November 2025 saw notable shifts in crime patterns, with other crime and possession of weapons both doubling from zero to two incidents, a 100% increase. This spike in possession of weapons—43% above the UK average of 0.1 per 1,000—raises questions about local enforcement or reporting practices. Conversely, anti-social behaviour dropped by 83.3% (6 to 1), possibly reflecting the end of seasonal events or heightened community vigilance. The breakdown also reveals a stark contrast in crime types: while violent crimes dominated at 57.7% of the total, property crimes accounted for only 27.3%, a divergence from the UK’s 34% violent crime share. This imbalance may reflect the area’s rural character, where property crimes are less common due to lower population density and fewer commercial hubs. Residents may find the 100% increase in possession of weapons particularly noteworthy, as it marks a first in the data series and could signal emerging trends. The decrease in anti-social behaviour, though significant, may be influenced by the timing of local events, such as the conclusion of Bonfire Night or reduced foot traffic during the holiday season. The rise in violent crimes, particularly violence and sexual offences, aligns with the seasonal context of darker evenings, which may extend the duration of potential incidents. These shifts highlight the importance of considering both local and national patterns when interpreting crime data.

In November 2025, Rural Breckland’s crime rate rose to 2.9 per 1,000 residents, an 18.3% increase from the previous month’s 2.5 per 1,000. This translates to roughly three crimes reported daily over the 30-day period, a figure that contextualises the pace of incidents within the area. When scaled to the population of 26,781, the monthly exposure means one reported crime occurred for roughly every 343 residents. While this rate remains significantly lower than the UK average of 7.3 per 1,000, the upward trend suggests a need to monitor local factors. The daily crime count, while low, underscores the frequency of incidents in a community where most residents are unlikely to encounter crime, but the cumulative effect over time may influence perceptions of safety. This perspective helps residents gauge how their experience aligns with broader statistical trends, even as the area continues to maintain a crime profile well below national benchmarks. The rural character of the area, with its lower population density and limited commercial hubs, likely contributes to the lower overall crime rate compared to urban centres. However, the rise in specific categories like possession of weapons raises questions about whether local enforcement practices or reporting mechanisms have shifted. The population-scaled metric of one crime per 343 residents offers a tangible way for residents to contextualise the risk, though this is a monthly aggregate and does not reflect daily patterns. The contrast between the local rate and the UK average highlights the area’s relative safety, but the month-on-month increase warrants attention to potential underlying factors, such as seasonal events or changes in policing strategies.