Cambridge Crime Rate June 2025 | Monthly Statistics

For a city of 187,642 residents, 1,445 crimes were recorded in Cambridge during June 2025. This equates to 7.7 crimes per 1,000 residents, placing the city 4.9% below the UK average of 8.1 per 1,000. The crime profile reflects patterns typical of a university city, with violence and sexual offences accounting for 27.5% of all reported incidents, followed by anti-social behaviour (18.3%) and shoplifting (14.6%). The seasonal context of June—marking the start of summer and the beginning of the tourist season—likely contributes to shifts in crime patterns. Retail areas and high streets, which are central to Cambridge’s economy, may explain the elevated rates of shoplifting compared to the UK average. Anti-social behaviour, often linked to student populations and late-night activity, remains a consistent concern. Meanwhile, the relatively low rate of burglary (3.3% of total crimes) suggests that targeted security measures in residential areas may be effective. The data also highlights a notable contrast in property crime versus violent crime: property crimes (604) make up 41.8% of all incidents, while violent crimes (398) account for 27.5%. This balance aligns with the city’s character as a mix of academic institutions, tourist attractions, and commuter hubs, where property-related offences may be more common due to the transient nature of populations. However, the lower-than-average rate of vehicle crime (19% below UK levels) could indicate successful policing strategies around parking areas and university campuses. As the summer season progresses, the interplay between increased foot traffic, student activities, and seasonal tourism will likely continue to shape the crime profile.

June 2025 saw several notable shifts in Cambridge’s crime trends. Theft from the person surged by 60%, rising from 25 to 40 incidents—a significant jump that may be linked to the influx of tourists and the increased foot traffic in city centre areas. Public order offences also rose by 20.7%, with 111 reports compared to 92 in May, potentially reflecting the impact of summer events and late-night gatherings. Conversely, robbery incidents fell sharply by 44.4%, from 18 to 10, which could be attributed to heightened police presence during peak tourist times or improved lighting in key areas. The city’s shoplifting rate—1.1 per 1,000 residents—remains 75% above the UK average of 0.6 per 1,000, underscoring the challenge of securing retail spaces in a city with a high concentration of universities and students. Bicycle theft, at 0.3 per 1,000 residents, is 329% above the UK average, highlighting the need for targeted measures in university-owned parking areas and cycle lanes. Meanwhile, criminal damage and arson decreased by 17.8%, from 107 to 88 incidents, due to the seasonal slowdown in construction activity or the effectiveness of local anti-vandalism campaigns. These changes illustrate the dynamic nature of Cambridge’s crime profile, shaped by both the city’s academic and tourist character and the seasonal rhythms of its population.

Cambridge’s crime rate of 7.7 per 1,000 residents in June 2025 represents a 2.2% decrease from the previous month’s rate of 7.9, indicating a modest but measurable decline in overall criminal activity. On a daily basis, the city experienced approximately 48 crimes per day in June, a figure that provides context for residents and businesses assessing local risks. Over the course of the month, one reported crime occurred for every 130 residents—a monthly exposure rate that, while not alarmingly high, remains a tangible reminder of the city’s ongoing need for vigilance. When viewed through the lens of Cambridge’s population size, the 1,445 total crimes equate to a crime rate that is both lower than the UK average and reflective of the city’s unique demographic and economic makeup. The relatively low burglary rate (3.3% of total crimes) and vehicle crime rate (19% below UK levels) suggest that specific areas—such as university campuses and residential zones—may have implemented effective security protocols. However, the elevated shoplifting and bicycle theft figures indicate that certain sectors, particularly retail and student housing, require further attention. For residents, these statistics offer a nuanced picture: while the city is generally safer than the national average, targeted interventions in high-risk areas remain crucial to maintaining this trend.