Stotfold Crime Rate June 2025 | Monthly Statistics

Stotfold’s overall crime rate in June 2025 stood at 3.6 per 1,000 residents, placing it 55.6% below the UK average of 8.1 per 1,000. This continued trend of lower-than-national rates suggests a combination of local factors, including a relatively stable community environment and effective policing in a built-up area within Central Bedfordshire. The most common crimes were violence and sexual offences (35.6% of all reported incidents), followed by anti-social behaviour (15.6%) and other theft (11.1%). These figures align with patterns seen in similar commuter-oriented or suburban areas, where personal safety and community cohesion often contribute to lower violent crime rates. Seasonal context also plays a role: as June marks the start of summer, increased daylight hours and tourism in nearby coastal areas may indirectly influence crime dynamics, though Stotfold itself does not appear to be a major tourist destination. The relatively low rate of property crime (29%) compared to violent crime (36%) further supports the notion of a community where interpersonal conflict and anti-social behaviour are more prominent issues than burglary or theft. This profile contrasts sharply with larger urban centres, where property crime often dominates. The data illustrates a consistent picture of a low-crime environment, though the nature of incidents reflects the challenges of managing social tensions in a densely populated built-up area.

June 2025 saw notable shifts in crime patterns, with vehicle crime rising 100% to two incidents (from one in May) and shoplifting and burglary both increasing to one reported incident each (up from zero). This uptick in vehicle-related crime may reflect seasonal changes, such as increased car usage during summer or temporary changes in local traffic patterns. Conversely, drugs-related offences fell by 50% to one incident (from two in May), suggesting a possible reduction in drug-related activity during the summer months. Anti-social behaviour also declined by 30%, dropping from 10 to seven incidents, a shift that could be linked to the start of the summer break or improved community engagement efforts. Violence and sexual offences decreased by 27.3%, from 22 to 16 incidents, though this remains the most prevalent category. The area’s violent crime rate (1.3 per 1,000) is 55% below the UK average, consistent with the broader trend of lower-than-national rates. These changes highlight the dynamic nature of local crime, with some categories responding to seasonal factors while others reflect ongoing community-level efforts. For residents, the stability in violent crime rates despite the increase in vehicle crime offers a mixed picture: while personal safety remains relatively secure, vigilance around vehicle security may be warranted.

Stotfold’s crime rate in June 2025 was 3.6 per 1,000 residents, a 6.2% decrease from the previous month’s rate of 3.9 per 1,000. This decline aligns with the broader trend of maintaining a crime rate significantly below the UK average. On a daily basis, the area saw an average of two crimes reported each day in June, a figure that, while low, reflects the small population of 12,479 residents. Over the course of the month, one reported crime occurred for roughly every 277 residents, a monthly exposure rate that underscores the relatively safe environment compared to larger urban centres. This figure is particularly meaningful for local residents, as it translates to a low likelihood of encountering crime in everyday life. The population context further highlights the area’s unique position: with fewer residents than many comparable towns, Stotfold’s crime statistics are influenced by both its size and its built-up nature. While the previous month’s rate was slightly higher, the overall trajectory remains one of sustained low crime, supported by the area’s demographic profile and local policing strategies. These comparisons reinforce the notion that Stotfold is an outlier in the UK crime profile, where its lower rates and stable trends contrast sharply with the national average.