East Suffolk Crime Rate April 2025 | Monthly Statistics

In April 2025, East Suffolk reported 1,115 crimes across its population of 249,664, translating to a crime rate of 4.5 per 1,000 residents. This figure is 41.6% below the UK average of 7.7 per 1,000, reflecting a consistently safer environment compared to the national standard. The most prevalent crime category was violence and sexual offences, accounting for 41.2% of all reported incidents (459 cases), followed by criminal damage and arson (10.9%) and anti-social behaviour (10.5%). These figures align with the area's seasonal context, as Easter and spring weather typically drive increased outdoor activity, which may partly explain the prominence of violent crimes. The rate of violence and sexual offences in East Suffolk (1.8 per 1,000) is 31% below the UK average (2.6 per 1,000), suggesting a lower incidence of interpersonal conflicts or effective community interventions. The relatively low levels of property crime—such as burglary (4.8%) and vehicle crime (3.3%)—contrast with the UK averages, indicating that East Suffolk's rural character and lower population density may contribute to reduced opportunities for such offences. However, the seasonal shift from winter to spring could also influence patterns, as warmer weather and longer evenings may encourage more public gatherings, increasing exposure to violent crime. The overall crime profile illustrates a balance between local demographics and national trends, with East Suffolk maintaining a distinct position in the UK's broader crime profile.

April 2025 saw stark fluctuations in specific crime categories. Theft from the person surged by 600% month-on-month, rising from 1 to 7 incidents—a dramatic increase that could signal heightened vulnerability during Easter-related events or changes in local activity patterns. Concurrently, drug-related offences rose by 50% (24 to 36), while robbery incidents climbed by 40% (5 to 7), both of which may reflect the impact of seasonal transitions on informal economies or social interactions. On the other hand, several categories experienced declines: possession of weapons fell by 35.7% (14 to 9), due to increased police visibility or community initiatives, and bicycle theft dropped by 29.4% (17 to 12), linked to improved security measures or reduced outdoor activity in certain areas. The crime mix also shifted significantly, with violent crimes comprising 41.2% of the total, compared to 31% of the UK average for the same category. This contrast highlights East Suffolk's relative success in mitigating violent crime, though the sharp rise in theft from the person underscores a pressing local concern. For residents, the 600% increase in theft from the person serves as a critical reminder to remain vigilant during public events, particularly in areas with high foot traffic during Easter.

East Suffolk's crime rate in April 2025 (4.5 per 1,000) represents a 3.5% decrease from the previous month's rate of 4.6 per 1,000, indicating a modest but measurable decline in overall criminal activity. On a daily basis, the area experienced approximately 37 crimes per day—equivalent to roughly one crime for every 224 residents over the course of the month. This monthly exposure figure provides context for how frequently residents might encounter crime in their daily lives, though this is an aggregate measure and does not reflect the distribution of crimes across different areas or demographics. When scaled to the local population of 249,664, the 1,115 reported crimes translate to a rate that is 41.6% below the UK average, underscoring East Suffolk's position as a relatively safe region. This comparative advantage is further reinforced by the area's performance in several key categories, such as anti-social behaviour (62% below the UK average) and public order offences (63% below). However, the 18% above-average rate for 'other crime' highlights a minor area of concern that may warrant closer attention. The combination of these figures, when viewed through the lens of East Suffolk's population size and geographic character, suggests that while the area benefits from lower crime rates overall, targeted efforts may still be needed to address specific vulnerabilities.