Eastleigh Crime Rate February 2026 | Monthly Statistics

Eastleigh’s crime rate for February 2026 stood at 4.7 crimes per 1,000 residents, marking a 26.6% reduction compared to the UK average of 6.4 per 1,000. This performance reflects a consistent trend of lower-than-average crime levels in the area, though the February figures reveal a nuanced picture. Violence and sexual offences dominated the crime profile, comprising 43.8% of all reported incidents, followed by anti-social behaviour at 14.0%. These rates align with broader patterns observed in urban centres where high population density and social dynamics contribute to higher violent crime proportions. The seasonal context of February—characterised by colder weather and reduced outdoor activity—may partly explain the relatively low overall crime rate compared to busier months. However, the data also highlights that Eastleigh’s violent crime rate (2.1 per 1,000) is 9% below the UK average, suggesting local factors such as community policing initiatives or effective crime prevention strategies could be playing a role. The lower-than-average rates for property crimes, including shoplifting (14% below UK average) and vehicle crime (71% below), further underscore the area’s comparative safety in these categories. While the winter lull may have contributed to this trend, the consistency of these figures over recent months indicates that Eastleigh’s crime profile is likely shaped by structural factors, such as the presence of public services and infrastructure that mitigate opportunities for crime.

February 2026 saw notable reductions in several crime categories, with burglary rates falling by 40.9% compared to the previous month, a decline that may reflect heightened community vigilance or effective targeted interventions. Vehicle crime also dropped by 37.0%, potentially linked to seasonal factors such as reduced outdoor activity and fewer car-related incidents in colder weather. Conversely, increases in theft from the person (+400%) and robbery (+350%) highlight areas requiring closer attention, though these spikes appear isolated and may be tied to specific incidents rather than broader trends. The sharp rise in possession of weapons (+100%) is a concern, but it remains a minor category (1.8% of total crimes) and is still below the UK average. The crime mix in Eastleigh continues to skew heavily towards violent and anti-social offences, which account for over 57% of all incidents, compared to property crimes making up just 21.7%. This balance suggests that local efforts to address violent crime—such as community engagement or improved lighting in high-risk areas—could be contributing to the area’s relatively lower rates of property-related offences. For residents, the most immediate insight is the significant drop in burglary, which may indicate that targeted policing or public awareness campaigns have had a measurable impact.

Eastleigh’s crime rate in February 2026 rose slightly from 4.6 to 4.7 per 1,000 residents, a 2.8% increase compared to the previous month. However, this minor uptick is negligible in the broader context of the area’s consistently low crime levels. On a daily basis, the local figure of 24 crimes per day (based on 28 days in February) provides a tangible measure of activity, though it remains well below the UK average. Over the course of the month, 1 crime occurred for every 211 residents, a ratio that underscores the relatively low exposure to crime in Eastleigh compared to other areas. With a population of 142,933, this monthly exposure rate translates to a manageable burden for local services and communities. The slight increase in the overall crime rate does not reflect a significant shift in the types of crimes reported, as most categories remain stable or improved. For example, the rate of anti-social behaviour (0.7 per 1,000) remains 23% below the UK average, and shoplifting continues to be 14% lower than national figures. These comparisons reinforce that Eastleigh’s crime profile is not only safer than the UK average but also more stable, with fluctuations appearing to be minor and context-specific rather than indicative of systemic issues.