Leominster Crime Rate June 2025 | Monthly Statistics

Leominster's crime rate in June 2025 stood at 10.2 per 1,000 residents, placing it 25.9% above the UK average of 8.1 per 1,000. This figure highlights a persistent challenge for the built-up area within Herefordshire, where violent crime dominates the crime profile. Violence and sexual offences accounted for 43.0% of all reported crimes, followed by anti-social behaviour (19.8%) and criminal damage and arson (10.7%). These patterns align with Leominster's character as a small town with a mix of residential and commercial zones, where high-street activity and community spaces may contribute to anti-social behaviour. The seasonal context of June—marking the start of summer—likely influences crime dynamics, as increased foot traffic and extended daylight hours may encourage both public order offences and retail-related incidents. While the overall rate remains elevated, the data suggests a nuanced picture: violent crime rates are significantly higher than the UK average (54% above), but shoplifting rates are slightly below the UK average (5% below). This contrast may reflect Leominster's retail environment, where local businesses could be more proactive in crime prevention than national trends indicate. The month also saw a marked shift in crime types, with property crimes (26 incidents) comprising only 21.5% of total crimes, compared to 43.0% for violent offences—a shift that underscores the growing focus on personal safety in the area. Such trends may be linked to broader societal factors, such as increased awareness of personal security or changes in local policing strategies. However, direct causal links, and further analysis would be required to explore these patterns in depth.

June 2025 saw a significant 58.8% decrease in shoplifting, dropping from 17 to 7 incidents—a change that may reflect improved retail security measures or seasonal shifts in consumer behaviour. This reduction contrasts with a 100% increase in 'other crime' (from 4 to 8 incidents), a category that includes unclassified offences and may signal emerging trends or underreporting in specific areas. Theft from the person also rose by 100%, from 0 to 1 incident, a figure that, while small, could indicate heightened awareness of personal safety during summer months. Meanwhile, criminal damage and arson increased by 44.4% (from 9 to 13 incidents), a rise that may be linked to the start of the summer season and increased outdoor activities. Conversely, vehicle crime fell by 50% (from 2 to 1 incident), due to reduced car usage during warmer weather or improved parking security. The data also reveals stark disparities compared to UK averages: violent crime in Leominster is 54% above the national rate, while burglary is 29% below. This divergence may be attributed to the town's relatively low population density and the absence of high-risk urban environments that drive property crime in larger cities. For residents, the most immediately relevant insight is the 58.8% drop in shoplifting, which could translate to lower losses for local businesses and greater confidence in retail areas.

Leominster's crime rate in June 2025 (10.2 per 1,000) marked a 12.3% decrease from May's rate of 11.6 per 1,000, indicating a short-term improvement in public safety. On a daily basis, the town recorded approximately 4 crimes per day in June, a figure that provides context for residents assessing local risk levels. Over the course of the month, one reported crime occurred for every 99 residents, a monthly exposure rate that, while higher than the UK average, may be influenced by the area's demographic profile and local crime prevention efforts. The population context is critical: with 11,924 residents, Leominster's crime statistics must be interpreted through the lens of its size and community dynamics. Smaller towns often experience more pronounced fluctuations in crime rates due to their limited population base, which can amplify both increases and decreases. For example, the 100% rise in 'other crime' (from 4 to 8 incidents) may appear significant in absolute terms but represents a manageable proportion of the total crime volume. Similarly, the 58.8% drop in shoplifting, while substantial, occurs against a backdrop where retail crime remains below the UK average. These comparisons underscore the importance of viewing Leominster's data within its own context rather than drawing direct parallels to larger urban centres. The monthly exposure rate of 1-in-99 residents also highlights the need for targeted interventions in high-risk areas, such as those experiencing spikes in violent or anti-social behaviour. While the overall rate remains elevated, the downward trend from May suggests that local initiatives—whether community policing, public awareness campaigns, or environmental design strategies—may be contributing to a more stable crime environment.