Kingston upon Hull Crime Rate February 2025 | Monthly Statistics

Kingston upon Hull's February 2025 crime rate of 9.9 per 1,000 residents places it 47.8% above the UK average of 6.7 per 1,000. This stark divergence from national trends underscores the city's distinct crime profile, shaped by its coastal location and urban fabric. Violence and sexual offences dominate the crime profile, accounting for 42.2% of all reported incidents, significantly exceeding the UK average for this category by 79%. Shoplifting and public order offences also show marked disparities, with the former 61% above the UK average and the latter 82% above. These figures suggest a concentration of crime in areas with high foot traffic, such as the city's retail and entertainment hubs, where transient populations may contribute to higher rates of property-related offences. The seasonal context of February—a winter month with reduced outdoor activity and a pre-spring lull—may temper some crime types, yet the persistent elevation of violent crime indicates deeper structural challenges. The city's historical economic struggles and social deprivation, coupled with its coastal isolation, likely play a role in sustaining these rates. While the UK as a whole has seen a gradual decline in violent crime over recent years, Hull's data reveals a different trajectory, highlighting the need for targeted interventions in high-risk areas. The dominance of violent crime over property crime also contrasts with broader UK trends, where property crime typically outpaces violent crime in most regions. This inversion may reflect local factors such as the presence of vulnerable populations, limited community policing resources, or systemic issues in housing and employment that exacerbate tensions. The data thus paints a complex picture of a city grappling with entrenched challenges, where the UK average serves as a benchmark but fails to capture the full scope of local realities.

February 2025 saw notable shifts in crime patterns for Kingston upon Hull, with drugs-related offences increasing by 28.6% compared to the previous month, rising from 63 to 81 incidents. This surge may be linked to seasonal factors, as winter months often see heightened substance use and associated criminal activity. Conversely, possession of weapons fell by 36.0%, declining from 25 to 16 incidents—a drop that could reflect successful policing efforts or reduced opportunities for such crimes during colder weather. The crime mix also shifted significantly, with violence and sexual offences maintaining their dominance (42.2% of all crimes) but property-related offences like shoplifting and public order crimes showing particularly sharp divergences from UK averages. Shoplifting, for instance, occurred at a rate 61% higher than the UK average, a figure that may be explained by the city's retail density and the presence of transient populations in commercial areas. Meanwhile, anti-social behaviour, though still a concern, was 48% below the UK average—a rare positive deviation that could indicate effective community engagement initiatives or a lower incidence of minor disturbances in public spaces. For residents, the most immediately relevant statistic is the 47.8% gap between Hull's crime rate and the UK average, a figure that underscores the urgency of addressing systemic issues in policing, social services, and economic development. The city's performance in categories like vehicle crime, which was 19% below the UK average, offers a counterpoint to its struggles with violent crime, suggesting that targeted interventions in specific areas can yield measurable results.

Kingston upon Hull's February 2025 crime rate of 9.9 per 1,000 residents marks a 7.3% decrease from the previous month's rate of 10.6 per 1,000, indicating a slight but notable improvement in overall safety. However, this reduction must be contextualised against the city's persistent elevation compared to the UK average, which remains 47.8% higher. On a daily basis, the area experienced approximately 97 crimes per day in February—a figure that, while alarming, provides a tangible measure of the city's challenges. When scaled to the population, the monthly exposure to crime was such that one reported crime occurred for roughly every 101 residents, a statistic that highlights the frequency of incidents in a densely populated urban setting. This monthly aggregate does not account for variations in daily activity levels, but it does offer a clear snapshot of the city's crime burden. The population context further underscores the scale of the issue: with 275,401 residents, even a modest increase in crime rates can translate to significant numbers of affected individuals. The contrast with the UK average is particularly stark, as the national figure of 6.7 per 1,000 residents suggests that Hull's residents face a higher risk of experiencing crime. This disparity may be attributed to the city's unique socio-economic profile, including higher levels of deprivation, historical underinvestment in infrastructure, and the challenges associated with being a coastal town with limited economic diversification. While the month-on-month decline is a positive sign, the broader comparison with the UK average reveals that Hull remains a city where crime is a more pressing concern than in many other parts of the country.