Kingston upon Hull Crime Rate January 2026 | Monthly Statistics

Kingston upon Hull's overall crime rate in January 2026 stood at 10.3 per 1,000 residents, placing the area 56.1% above the UK average of 6.6 per 1,000. This figure underscores a persistent challenge for local authorities, though the data reveals a nuanced picture of crime distribution. Violence and sexual offences dominated the crime profile, accounting for 42% of all reported incidents, followed by shoplifting (8.8%) and criminal damage and arson (8.6%). These figures align with the area's historical patterns, where high levels of violent crime have been consistently observed. The seasonal context of January—a post-holiday period marked by reduced retail footfall and shorter days—may have contributed to the lower volume of outdoor crimes typically associated with busier months. However, the dominance of violent crime suggests deeper, year-round factors at play, such as socioeconomic pressures or community dynamics that require targeted interventions. The rate of anti-social behaviour was 45% below the UK average, a potential indicator of effective local policing strategies or community engagement efforts. The data also highlights stark disparities within the crime profile: while shoplifting and public order offences were significantly above UK averages, theft from the person was 100% below, a contrast that may reflect the area's unique demographic and geographic characteristics. This combination of factors demands a multifaceted approach to crime prevention, balancing immediate enforcement with long-term social investments.

The month-on-month analysis reveals a mixed picture of crime trends in January 2026. Burglary increased by 21.0% compared to December, rising from 124 to 150 incidents. This uptick could be linked to seasonal factors, such as colder weather driving more indoor activities, or shifts in policing focus during the post-holiday period. Similarly, vehicle crime rose by 13.6%, possibly reflecting increased reliance on private vehicles in the absence of public transport during inclement weather. Possession of weapons saw the most dramatic increase, surging 38.5% from 26 to 36 cases—a troubling development that may indicate heightened tensions or challenges in enforcing gun control measures. Conversely, bicycle theft decreased by 27.1%, a decline that may be attributed to reduced outdoor activity during January's shorter days. Other theft also fell by 18.9%, suggesting that targeted anti-theft campaigns or improved retail security measures may have had an impact. The crime mix remains heavily skewed towards violent offences, with violence and sexual offences accounting for 42% of all crimes—76% above the UK average. This stark contrast with the UK profile highlights the area's unique challenges, particularly in addressing violent crime. Meanwhile, anti-social behaviour's 45% deficit relative to the UK average offers a rare positive note, though it remains to be seen whether this reflects sustained improvements or temporary fluctuations.

Compared to December 2025, Kingston upon Hull's crime rate in January 2026 showed a marginal decline of 1.9%, falling from 10.5 to 10.3 per 1,000 residents. While this small decrease may seem inconsequential in isolation, it is important to contextualise it within the area's broader crime profile. Over the course of January, 91 crimes were reported daily—roughly equivalent to one crime occurring for every 98 residents. This monthly exposure figure, though slightly lower than the previous month, still illustrates a community where crime is an everyday concern. When viewed through the lens of population, the 275,401 residents of Kingston upon Hull experience a crime rate that is 56.1% higher than the UK average, a disparity that underscores the area's distinct challenges. The previous month's rate of 10.5 per 1,000 provides a useful benchmark, but it is the consistency of these elevated figures that demands attention. Residents living in areas with high concentrations of violent crime, such as the town centre or industrial zones, may find the statistics particularly relevant, as these regions often see disproportionate impacts. The daily crime count, while a useful metric for understanding frequency, does not capture the full human cost of these numbers. For families, workers, and local businesses, the persistent presence of crime—even at a stable rate—can have cumulative effects on quality of life, economic activity, and community cohesion. This comparative analysis reinforces the need for sustained efforts to address the root causes of crime in the area, particularly in relation to violent offences.