Maidstone Crime Rate November 2025 | Monthly Statistics

Maidstone's crime rate in November 2025 stood at 7.2 per 1,000 residents, placing it 1.4% below the UK average of 7.3. This slight edge over the national figure contrasts with the local profile of violence and sexual offences, which were 2.8 per 1,000 — 9% higher than the UK average of 2.6. This category alone accounted for nearly 40% of all reported crimes, highlighting a persistent challenge in the area. Anti-social behaviour and criminal damage followed closely, with rates 23% and 32% above UK averages respectively. These figures align with the seasonal rhythm of November, a month marked by extended evenings, the Bonfire Night celebrations, and the retail rush of Black Friday. While such events can contribute to spikes in public order issues and anti-social conduct, the overall rate remains marginally lower than the UK benchmark. The dominance of violent crime suggests a need for targeted interventions in high-traffic areas, such as the town centre, where late-night activity may exacerbate tensions. Meanwhile, property crime rates, though lower than the UK average for categories like shoplifting and vehicle crime, reflect a combination of local demographics and economic factors. The data underscores the importance of contextualising crime trends within Maidstone's unique character as a commuter hub and historic town, where the balance between urban and rural influences may shape the crime profile differently than in more densely populated regions.

November 2025 saw notable shifts in specific crime categories, with bicycle theft rising by 66.7% (3 to 5 incidents) and shoplifting increasing by 14.4% (104 to 119). These changes, though modest in absolute terms, suggest evolving patterns in criminal activity, potentially linked to seasonal factors such as the increased foot traffic during Black Friday. Conversely, robbery rates fell sharply by 66.7% (from 6 to 2 incidents), a decline that may reflect improved security measures or reduced opportunities in high-risk areas. The data also reveals stark contrasts between Maidstone and the UK average for certain categories: anti-social behaviour was 23% above the national rate, while burglary was 67% below. This divergence highlights the local impact of community-specific dynamics, such as the presence of anti-social behaviour hotspots near public transport hubs or the relatively low incidence of burglary in a district with a strong residential character. For residents, the 2.3% increase in overall crime rate compared to the previous month (from 7.0 to 7.2 per 1,000) serves as a reminder that while Maidstone remains slightly safer than the UK average, vigilance is required during periods of heightened activity. The continued rise in drug-related crimes (+28.0% from 50 to 64 incidents) also warrants attention, pointing to shifts in local drug markets or increased reporting due to awareness campaigns.

Maidstone's crime rate in November 2025 rose by 2.3% compared to the previous month's rate of 7.0 per 1,000, reflecting a modest upward trend in the local crime picture. On a daily basis, this translates to approximately 45 crimes reported each day in Maidstone, a figure that, while routine, underscores the continuous presence of criminal activity within the district. When scaled to the population of 187,767 residents, the monthly exposure to crime means that over the course of November, one reported crime occurred for roughly every 140 residents — a statistic that contextualises the frequency of incidents within the community. This monthly aggregate, though not directly comparable to UK-wide figures (which are not provided here), allows for a nuanced understanding of how Maidstone's crime profile interacts with its demographic and geographic characteristics. For instance, the relatively low rate of burglary (67% below the UK average) may be influenced by the area's mix of suburban and rural settings, where traditional burglary targets are less concentrated than in densely populated urban centres. Conversely, the elevated rates of anti-social behaviour and criminal damage suggest that certain parts of Maidstone, particularly those with high foot traffic or transient populations, may face unique challenges in managing public order. These comparisons highlight the importance of tailoring local strategies to the specific needs of Maidstone, rather than applying blanket solutions derived from national trends.