Ashtead Crime Rate January 2026 | Monthly Statistics

The crime profile in Ashtead during January 2026 reveals a distinct balance between violent and property crimes, shaped by the area’s character as a built-up settlement within Mole Valley. With a total crime rate of 2.1 per 1,000 residents—69.1% below the UK average of 6.8—the area remains safer than the national average. Violence and sexual offences dominated the crime mix, accounting for 37.5% of all reported incidents, followed closely by property crimes (13 incidents, 25% of total). This distribution aligns with the area’s characteristics: a mix of residential zones and commercial hubs that may contribute to both personal safety concerns and property-related incidents. Seasonal context further influences these figures, as January’s post-holiday period typically sees reduced retail activity and shorter daylight hours, which may limit opportunities for outdoor crimes. However, the persistent presence of violence and sexual offences suggests underlying factors such as community dynamics or local policing priorities that warrant further attention. Property crimes, while lower than the UK average for most categories, show a notable exception in burglary, which occurs at 0.5 per 1,000 residents—79% above the UK rate of 0.3. This discrepancy could reflect the area’s built-up nature, with a higher concentration of homes and businesses that may be more attractive to burglars. The relatively low rates of anti-social behaviour, public order, and vehicle crime (all 70–79% below UK averages) may indicate a community with strong social cohesion or effective local initiatives. These patterns illustrate how Ashtead’s crime mix is shaped by both its geographic context and seasonal rhythms, offering a nuanced picture of safety that extends beyond simple numerical comparisons.

January 2026 saw significant shifts in Ashtead’s crime mix, with anti-social behaviour surging by 200% (from 1 to 3 incidents) and burglary doubling (from 4 to 8). These increases contrast with declines in violence and sexual offences (-20%, from 15 to 12) and criminal damage and arson (-60%, from 5 to 2). The rise in anti-social behaviour may be linked to post-holiday social gatherings or increased indoor activity during shorter daylight hours. Meanwhile, the doubling of burglary cases—despite remaining below the UK average for most categories—suggests a need for targeted security measures in residential areas. Violence and sexual offences, though still the most common category, saw a marked decrease, possibly reflecting seasonal trends or effective policing efforts. Ashtead’s burglary rate (0.5 per 1,000) is 79% above the UK average (0.3 per 1,000), highlighting a local risk that could be influenced by factors such as home security practices or the density of properties in the area. Residents may find the sharp increase in anti-social behaviour particularly concerning, as it represents a threefold rise in a single month and could indicate underlying social tensions or gaps in community support systems. These findings underscore the importance of monitoring specific crime types even within an overall low-crime environment.

Ashtead’s crime rate in January 2026 (2.1 per 1,000 residents) marked a 15.7% decrease from the previous month’s rate of 2.5, reflecting a continued trend of declining incidents. On a daily basis, the area recorded approximately one crime per day over the 31-day period, a figure that translates to a monthly exposure of one reported crime for every 468 residents. This rate is significantly lower than the UK average, though the local context reveals nuanced differences. For instance, while Ashtead’s burglary rate is 79% above the UK average (0.5 vs 0.3 per 1,000), its rates for violence and sexual offences (0.8 per 1,000) are 68% below the UK average (2.5 per 1,000). This contrast highlights how local factors—such as the built-up nature of the area, its proximity to commuter routes, or community engagement initiatives—can shape crime patterns differently than national trends. The population-scaled perspective also provides insight: with 14,966 residents, the monthly crime total of 32 translates to a 0.0021% chance of any individual being directly affected, a statistic that may help residents contextualise their personal risk. While the overall rate remains low, the disparity in specific categories—particularly burglary—suggests that certain vulnerabilities persist, even in an area generally safer than the UK average. These comparisons reinforce the importance of tailored approaches to crime prevention that address local challenges without overgeneralising from national data.