Great Bookham and Fetcham Crime Rate April 2025 | Monthly Statistics

The crime mix in Great Bookham and Fetcham for April 2025 reveals a distinct profile compared to national trends. Violence and sexual offences accounted for 37.8% of all crimes, the largest single category, followed by anti-social behaviour (18.9%) and public order offences (9.5%). This emphasis on interpersonal crime contrasts with the UK average, where property-related crimes typically dominate. The area’s violent crime rate of 1.3 per 1,000 residents is 50% below the UK average of 2.6 per 1,000, suggesting a lower incidence of violent incidents despite the high proportion of such crimes locally. This paradox may be explained by the area’s built-up nature, which could foster greater social interaction and policing presence in public spaces, deterring more serious offences. Conversely, property crimes such as shoplifting and burglary are significantly lower than the UK average, with shoplifting at 0.2 per 1,000 (70% below UK rates) and burglary at 0.1 per 1,000 (63% below). This could reflect the influence of smaller, community-oriented businesses that may reduce opportunities for theft compared to large retail chains in urban areas. Seasonal factors also appear to shape crime patterns, with April’s Easter period contributing to fluctuations in vehicle crime and drugs-related offences. The area’s crime profile, therefore, illustrates a combination of strong community dynamics, effective local policing, and seasonal influences that distinguish it from broader UK trends.

April 2025 saw a 50% increase in vehicle crime, rising from 2 to 3 incidents, potentially linked to increased Easter travel or seasonal shifts in parking patterns. Conversely, drugs-related offences fell by 66.7%, from 3 to 1, possibly reflecting temporary reductions in illicit activity during the Easter period. Violent crimes, at 28 incidents (37.8% of total), remained 50% below the UK average of 2.6 per 1,000, illustrating a consistent deviation from national trends. Anti-social behaviour and public order offences also fell significantly below UK averages, with 55% and 44% reductions respectively. These figures suggest that local community dynamics, such as strong neighborhood cohesion or effective policing in public spaces, may play a role in maintaining lower rates of disorder-related crime. The 70% reduction in shoplifting compared to the UK average highlights the area’s lower prevalence of retail-related crimes, which may be influenced by the presence of smaller, community-focused businesses that foster closer customer relationships. This contrast with urban centres, where larger retail chains often report higher theft rates, further underscores the distinct character of Great Bookham and Fetcham’s built-up environment. The increase in vehicle crime, however, raises questions about how seasonal mobility patterns interact with local infrastructure, such as parking availability and traffic management during holidays.

The crime rate in Great Bookham and Fetcham fell by 28.9% in April 2025 compared to March 2025, dropping from 4.6 to 3.3 per 1,000 residents. This decline aligns with seasonal patterns seen in similar built-up areas, where spring weather and Easter-related activities may reduce opportunities for certain crimes. Over the 30-day period, the average daily crime count was 2 incidents per day, consistent with the area’s historically low crime profile. When scaled to the population of 22,408, the monthly exposure translates to one reported crime for every 303 residents — a statistic that underscores the rarity of crime in this relatively small, densely populated region. This rate is lower than the UK average, with 57.1% fewer crimes per 1,000 residents. The population-scaled perspective highlights that residents here face significantly less frequent exposure to crime than the national average, though localized factors such as community engagement and rural-urban dynamics may contribute to this disparity. The built-up nature of the area, combined with its integration into Mole Valley’s broader infrastructure, could further explain the reduced incidence of property crimes and anti-social behaviour compared to more isolated or densely populated regions. This suggests that the area’s social cohesion and infrastructure may play a role in maintaining lower crime rates, even during periods of increased outdoor activity.