Barton-upon-Humber Crime Rate February 2026 | Monthly Statistics

Barton-upon-Humber’s crime profile in February 2026 reveals a distinct balance between violent and property crimes, with both accounting for nearly 65% of all reported incidents. Violent crimes, including sexual offences and assaults, made up 29.9% of the total (23 cases), while property crimes such as burglary and shoplifting accounted for 37.6% (29 cases). This mix suggests a community where interpersonal conflict and commercial activity intersect.4 per 1,000 residents aligns precisely with the UK average, indicating no significant deviation from national trends. Seasonal factors may play a role, as February—a winter month with reduced outdoor activity—typically sees lower levels of certain crimes like vehicle theft or public order offences. However, the sharp rise in shoplifting and burglary compared to January (despite the pre-spring lull) suggests potential shifts in criminal behaviour during this period. The prominence of violent crimes may reflect local dynamics such as the town’s proximity to major transport routes or the presence of transient populations in the area. Meanwhile, the relatively low rate of anti-social behaviour (9.1%) and drug-related offences (1.3%) could indicate effective community policing or a lower prevalence of substance abuse issues compared to other regions. This balance of crime types offers insight into the area’s social and economic character, where commercial interests and residential stability coexist with occasional spikes in specific categories.

February 2026 saw stark month-on-month changes in Barton-upon-Humber’s crime profile, with shoplifting surging by 800% (from 1 to 9 cases) and burglary rising by 300% (from 1 to 4). These increases, though small in absolute terms, suggest targeted criminal activity that may coincide with seasonal factors such as post-Christmas retail closures or reduced staffing in local stores. Anti-social behaviour also rose by 133.3%, potentially linked to colder weather driving more indoor gatherings or heightened tensions in shared housing environments. In contrast, other theft fell by 50% (from 8 to 4), indicating possible improvements in security measures or reduced opportunities for opportunistic crimes. Violent crimes, however, declined by 14.8% compared to January, with violence and sexual offences dropping from 27 to 23. This decrease may reflect the impact of winter holidays reducing social interactions or increased police visibility in key areas. Certain crime types diverge sharply from UK averages: criminal damage and arson (74% above the UK rate) and shoplifting (38% above) highlight local vulnerabilities, while anti-social behaviour (34% below the UK average) and other theft (29% below) suggest areas of relative strength. These comparisons reveal a combination of local conditions, with property crime trends influenced by Barton-upon-Humber’s built-up area status and proximity to industrial zones.

The crime rate in Barton-upon-Humber rose sharply in February 2026, increasing by 35.2% compared to the previous month’s rate of 4.8 per 1,000 residents. This jump, though not uncommon for winter months, translates to roughly 3 reported crimes per day across the built-up area’s population of 11,989. Over the course of the month, one crime occurred for every 156 residents—a figure that, while comparable to other UK towns, underscores the concentrated nature of incidents in a relatively small community. The population-scaled perspective reveals that Barton-upon-Humber’s crime density is typical for its size, with no significant deviation from national patterns. However, the month-on-month increase contrasts with the area’s alignment with the UK average overall rate, suggesting temporary fluctuations rather than long-term trends. Daily crime counts, while modest, indicate a consistent level of activity that residents should remain aware of, particularly given the significant spikes in shoplifting and burglary. The 1-in-156 resident exposure rate also highlights the importance of community engagement and local policing strategies in managing crime levels. Despite the rise, the absence of major violent incidents or large-scale property crimes indicates that the area’s infrastructure and social cohesion may help mitigate more severe criminal activity.