North Somerset Crime Rate September 2025 | Monthly Statistics

For residents of North Somerset, the crime rate of 7.4 per 1,000 residents in September 2025 translates to a daily risk of encountering roughly one crime for every 135 people over the course of the month. This figure aligns precisely with the UK average, yet the distribution of crime types reveals a distinct local profile. Violence and sexual offences accounted for 40.7% of all crimes, significantly higher than the UK average for this category (2.6 per 1,000). This may partly explain the heightened sense of personal safety concerns in the area, particularly during the transition to darker evenings and the start of the academic year. Anti-social behaviour, at 13.3% of total crimes, was 15% below the UK average, suggesting that community-focused initiatives or demographic factors may contribute to lower levels of disorder in public spaces. The seasonal context of September—marked by the return to school, university freshers, and the draw of shorter days—likely influences the mix of crimes, with public order incidents rising 48% above the UK average. This could reflect increased tensions in nightlife areas or the pressures of adjusting to new routines. While the overall rate remains stable, the specific patterns highlight the need for targeted awareness, especially in areas with higher concentrations of young people or transient populations.

September saw notable shifts in crime trends, with three categories experiencing significant increases. Other crime surged by 128.6%, rising from 21 to 48 incidents, a jump that may reflect the complexity of unclassified offences or the emergence of new criminal activities. Burglary increased by 44.7%, from 47 to 68 cases, which could be linked to seasonal patterns such as the return of students to university halls or the increased presence of temporary residents. Vehicle crime also rose sharply by 34.2%, from 38 to 51 incidents, tied to the influx of visitors or changes in parking habits during the university term. Conversely, several categories declined: theft from the person fell by 50%, from 2 to 1, due to increased awareness or the use of personal security measures. Robbery dropped by 50%, from 22 to 11, a decrease that may be attributed to heightened police presence or the natural fluctuation of seasonal crime. Possession of weapons declined by 45.5%, from 11 to 6, which could indicate the effectiveness of local enforcement strategies or the dispersal of transient groups. These changes underscore the dynamic nature of crime in North Somerset, where specific categories can shift dramatically within a single month, requiring continuous monitoring and adaptive responses.

When compared to the previous month, North Somerset's crime rate remained stable at 7.4 per 1,000 residents, a slight 1.2% decrease from September's prior rate of 7.5. This marginal shift suggests that the overall crime environment has not changed significantly, though local fluctuations in specific categories may reflect temporary factors. On a daily basis, the area experienced approximately 55 crimes per day in September, a figure that, while seemingly high, must be contextualised within the population of 224,578 residents. This equates to a monthly exposure rate of one crime for every 135 residents, a statistic that provides a tangible measure of risk for individuals living or working in the area. When viewed through the lens of population density and local demographics, this rate is neither exceptionally high nor low, aligning with the broader UK average. However, the distribution of crime types reveals a unique local pattern: while violence and sexual offences are 16% above the UK average, other categories such as shoplifting and vehicle crime are significantly below national figures. This contrast may be influenced by the area's mix of rural and urban characteristics, with higher levels of interpersonal crime in densely populated zones and lower levels of property-related offences in more spread-out communities. Understanding these nuances is crucial for residents seeking to gauge their personal risk and for policymakers aiming to allocate resources effectively.