Bulkington Crime Rate May 2025 | Monthly Statistics

Bulkington’s crime rate in May 2025 stood at 4.2 per 1,000 residents, placing it 48.1% below the UK average of 8.1. This stark contrast highlights the area’s unique position within the national crime profile, where the built-up nature of the district within Nuneaton and Bedworth may contribute to its relatively low crime profile. The most frequently reported crime category was violence and sexual offences, accounting for 42.3% of all incidents, followed by anti-social behaviour at 26.9% and public order offences at 7.7%. These figures suggest a focus on interpersonal conflicts and community disruptions, which may be influenced by the area’s mix of residential and commercial spaces. The UK average for violence and sexual offences is 2.8 per 1,000, meaning Bulkington’s rate is 36% lower, a disparity that could reflect local policing strategies or demographic factors. However, the higher proportion of violent crimes compared to the national average indicates a persistent challenge for local authorities. Seasonal factors may also play a role, as May’s bank holidays and extended daylight hours could influence social interactions and crime opportunities. While the overall crime rate remains low, the shift in crime types—particularly the rise in shoplifting and drugs-related offences—warrants closer examination. These changes, though minor, could signal emerging issues that require targeted interventions. The data also reveals a significant gap in property crimes compared to the UK average, which may be attributed to the area’s lower population density and the presence of community-focused initiatives that deter such offences. As the area continues to monitor these trends, the interplay between local demographics, policing efforts, and seasonal dynamics will remain critical to understanding the evolving crime picture.

May 2025 saw notable shifts in crime patterns, with drugs-related offences doubling from zero to one incident, and shoplifting increasing from zero to two. These increases, though small in absolute terms, suggest emerging trends that may warrant local monitoring. Conversely, other crime, other theft, and criminal damage and arson each halved, reflecting a sharp decline in these categories. The proportion of violent crimes (42.3% of total) remained higher than the UK average for this category (36%), indicating a persistent local challenge. Anti-social behaviour, at 26.9% of total crimes, was 23% below the UK average, possibly linked to community-focused initiatives or lower population density. The absence of property crimes in the breakdown contrasts with the UK’s higher property crime rates, hinting at differences in local demographics or policing priorities. Residents may find the 100% increase in shoplifting noteworthy, as it signals a new risk factor for retail areas despite the overall low crime rate.

Bulkington’s crime rate in May 2025 dropped to 4.2 per 1,000 residents, a 27.7% decrease from April 2025’s 5.9. This decline aligns with broader seasonal trends observed in the region, where longer evenings and bank holidays in May often correlate with shifts in crime patterns. On a daily basis, the area experienced approximately one crime reported every 31 days, a figure that translates to a local monthly exposure of one crime for every 237 residents. Given Bulkington’s population of 6,150, this low crime density contrasts sharply with the UK average, where the equivalent monthly exposure would be significantly higher. The built-up area’s relatively small size and lower population density likely contribute to this distinct profile. While the rate of violent crimes in Bulkington (1.8 per 1,000) is 36% below the UK average for this category, the monthly exposure metric underscores how even modest crime levels can feel impactful in smaller communities. The shift from May 2025 to April 2025 reflects a consistent pattern of reduced crime, possibly influenced by seasonal factors such as the end of school term holidays and reduced outdoor activity during the transition to summer. This context helps explain the month-on-month decrease without assuming direct causation.