Shoplifting is a persistent concern for businesses, and Milford Haven faces a notably higher risk than the national average. The area, a Built-Up Area (BUA) in Pembrokeshire with a population of 16,485, currently has a crime rate of 139.3 incidents per 1,000 people. This is considerably above the UK average of 91.6 per 1,000, highlighting a greater vulnerability for local businesses. The safety score of 64/100 further reinforces this, being below the UK average of 79.
So, what can Milford Haven businesses do to mitigate the risk of shoplifting? Several preventative measures can be implemented. Firstly, visible security is a powerful deterrent. Installing CCTV cameras and clearly displaying signage indicating their presence can discourage potential thieves. This doesn't necessarily require expensive systems; even strategically placed, visible cameras can make a difference.
Secondly, staff training is essential. Employees should be trained to recognise suspicious behaviour, approach potential shoplifters politely but firmly, and understand the correct procedures to follow if they suspect theft. This training should cover observation skills and de-escalation techniques.
Thirdly, layout and merchandising can play a role. Placing high-value items within clear view of staff or near the checkout can reduce the opportunity for theft. Consider rearranging displays periodically to disrupt established shoplifting patterns.
Fourthly, consistent inventory management helps identify discrepancies quickly, potentially indicating shoplifting. Regularly reconciling stock levels with sales data allows for prompt investigation of any unusual losses.
Finally, collaboration with the local police is vital. Reporting incidents promptly and sharing information about known offenders can contribute to a safer environment for all businesses in Milford Haven. While the data doesn't provide specific police response times or initiatives, maintaining open communication with local law enforcement is always beneficial. Understanding that the crime rate is significantly elevated compared to the UK average (139.3 vs 91.6) underscores the need for proactive measures.