Pendle Crime Rate February 2025 | Monthly Statistics

Pendle's overall crime rate for February 2025 stood at 7.1 per 1,000 residents, placing it 6% above the UK average of 6.7 per 1,000. This position highlights a distinct pattern in the local crime profile, with violence and sexual offences (254 incidents, 35.8% of total) and anti-social behaviour (211 incidents, 29.8%) emerging as the most prominent categories. These figures contrast sharply with the UK averages for these categories, where violence and sexual offences were 11% lower (2.4 per 1,000) and anti-social behaviour was 116% lower (1.0 per 1,000). The seasonal context of February—a winter month marked by reduced outdoor activity and a pre-spring lull—may partly explain the prominence of indoor-related crimes such as anti-social behaviour, which often escalates during colder periods when social interactions are concentrated in enclosed spaces. The relatively low rates of property crimes (176 incidents, 24.8% of total) compared to the UK average suggest a different dynamic at play, potentially linked to Pendle's geographical character. As a district encompassing both rural and urban areas, Pendle may experience unique crime patterns shaped by its mix of residential communities and smaller commercial hubs, where property crime is less concentrated than in larger urban centres. This interplay between local geography and seasonal factors appears to influence the crime profile, with violent crime and anti-social behaviour taking precedence over property-related offences during the winter months.

February 2025 saw notable shifts in Pendle's crime profile, with specific categories showing marked changes compared to January. Theft from the person rose by 50% (from 2 to 3 incidents), a small but significant increase that may reflect heightened vigilance during colder months or targeted activity in high-traffic areas. Conversely, drug-related crimes fell sharply by 61.5% (from 13 to 5), a reduction that could indicate successful local interventions or a seasonal lull in related activities. Possession of weapons also increased by 14.3% (from 7 to 8), a figure that, while modest, may warrant closer attention given the 67% above UK average rate for this category (0.1 per 1,000). The most striking disparity remains in anti-social behaviour, which was 116% above the UK average (2.1 per 1,000 vs 1.0 per 1,000), suggesting a concentrated issue in specific areas or demographics. This category's dominance—accounting for nearly 30% of all crimes—raises questions about community engagement and policing strategies in Pendle. Meanwhile, property crimes such as burglary and shoplifting remained below UK averages, with burglary at 11% above the national rate (0.3 per 1,000 vs 0.3 per 1,000) and shoplifting 52% below (0.3 per 1,000 vs 0.6 per 1,000). These figures may reflect Pendle's mix of urban and rural environments, where property crime is less prevalent than in densely populated areas. For residents, the most immediate concern appears to be the persistent elevation in anti-social behaviour, which remains significantly higher than the UK average despite the month-on-month decline in other categories.

Pendle's crime rate in February 2025 (7.1 per 1,000) marked a 6.2% decrease from the previous month's rate of 7.6 per 1,000, indicating a slight downward trend. This reduction, however, still leaves Pendle above the UK average, highlighting the area's unique challenges. On a daily basis, Pendle experienced approximately 25 crimes per day in February, a figure that may seem high to residents but is contextually significant when considering the district's population of 99,777. Over the course of the month, one reported crime occurred for roughly every 141 residents—a monthly exposure rate that, while not alarmingly high, underscores the need for continued vigilance. This figure is particularly relevant for local communities, as it provides a tangible sense of the frequency of crime in daily life. The population-scaled perspective reveals that Pendle's crime rate, though slightly above the UK average, is not drastically so, suggesting that local factors rather than systemic issues may be at play. The 6% above UK average figure must be interpreted alongside Pendle's geographical and demographic characteristics, which likely influence crime patterns differently than in other regions. For instance, the prominence of anti-social behaviour and violence may reflect local social dynamics or environmental factors not captured in national statistics. These comparisons offer a nuanced view of Pendle's position within the UK crime profile, balancing the area's specific challenges against broader national trends.