Church Village Crime Rate February 2026 | Monthly Statistics

The crime profile of Church Village in February 2026 reveals a distinct balance between violent and property offences, with violence and sexual offences making up nearly a third of all reported crimes. At 2.3 crimes per 1,000 residents, the area’s crime rate is 64.1% below the UK average of 6.4 per 1,000, a gap that underscores the relatively low level of criminal activity compared to national trends. The top crime category—violence and sexual offences (0.8 per 1,000)—is 66% below the UK average for this category, suggesting that the area’s built-up character may foster a mix of community dynamics that mitigate certain types of crime while leaving others more pronounced. Property crimes, which include shoplifting, vehicle crime, and criminal damage, collectively account for 43.7% of reported incidents, but each of these subcategories is also significantly below the UK average. This pattern may reflect the area’s smaller scale and lower population density, which could reduce opportunities for property-related crimes but not eliminate them entirely. Seasonal factors also appear to play a role, as February’s low outdoor activity and pre-spring lull likely contribute to a quieter crime environment, though the persistence of violent offences suggests other local factors at play, such as community interactions or local pressures. The data highlights a combination of the area’s physical characteristics, seasonal rhythms, and demographic makeup, all of which shape the crime mix in ways that differ from broader national patterns.

February 2026 saw notable shifts in crime patterns, with criminal damage and arson surging by 300% compared to the previous month, rising from 1 to 4 incidents. This increase, alongside a 100% rise in shoplifting and other theft, points to a possible uptick in property-related offences, even as overall crime rates remain well below the UK average. The decrease in violence and sexual offences—down 26.7% from 15 to 11—contrasts with the UK average of 2.3 per 1,000, indicating that Church Village’s violent crime rate (0.8 per 1,000) is 66% below the national benchmark. This divergence raises questions about local factors that may temper violent crime, such as community cohesion or effective local policing. Meanwhile, the sharp rise in shoplifting—jumping from 0 to 4 incidents—could signal heightened activity in retail areas, linked to seasonal shifts or changes in consumer behaviour. The fact that all property crime categories (criminal damage, public order, shoplifting, vehicle crime) are below the UK average, with shoplifting at 48% below, suggests that the area’s built-up nature and smaller population may limit opportunities for such crimes. Residents might find the 100% increase in shoplifting particularly noteworthy, as it could indicate a need for enhanced retail security measures or increased community awareness.

Church Village’s crime rate in February 2026 rose by 18.4% from the previous month’s 1.9 per 1,000 to 2.3 per 1,000, though this remains far below the UK average. On a daily basis, the area recorded roughly 1 crime per day over the 28-day period, translating to a monthly exposure rate of 1 crime for every 444 residents. Given the population of 14,219, this means that the likelihood of any individual resident being directly affected by crime in a single month is relatively low, though the increase from the previous month suggests a slight upward trend. When viewed in context, the area’s crime rate is 64.1% below the UK average, a gap that highlights its status as a relatively safe built-up area. The population-scaled perspective further illustrates that the crime rate is distributed across a smaller community, which may amplify the visibility of individual incidents while keeping overall levels low. The comparison to the UK average also underscores the effectiveness of local crime prevention efforts, as multiple categories—including violence, criminal damage, and public order offences—are significantly below national benchmarks. This contrast with the UK’s higher rates may reflect the area’s specific characteristics, such as its smaller size, lower population density, or the presence of community initiatives that reduce crime opportunities.