Dinnington (Rotherham) Crime Rate February 2025 | Monthly Statistics

February 2025 marked a notable shift in the crime profile of Dinnington (Rotherham), with a crime rate of 7.3 per 1,000 residents—9% above the UK average of 6.7. This built-up area within Rotherham saw violence and sexual offences dominate the crime profile, accounting for 43.3% of all reported incidents. Anti-social behaviour followed closely at 22.1%, while criminal damage and arson made up 7.7% of the total. These figures suggest a concentration of interpersonal and property-related issues, which may be influenced by the seasonal context of winter months. February, typically a period of low outdoor activity and a pre-spring lull, could contribute to patterns of indoor social conflict and reduced community surveillance. The absence of significant seasonal events in February, combined with the area’s urban density, may create conditions where anti-social behaviour and violence are more likely to escalate. However, direct causal links; the combination of factors such as colder weather, shorter daylight hours, and the end of the festive season could play a role. The crime rate’s proximity to the UK average suggests that local conditions are broadly in line with national trends, though the specific emphasis on violence and anti-social behaviour highlights unique local challenges. The breakdown of crime types indicates that property crimes, while present, are not the most pressing concern, with violent crimes forming the largest category. This contrast may reflect the area’s demographic and geographic characteristics, such as a mix of residential and commercial zones that could influence both property and personal safety risks.

The month-on-month analysis reveals stark increases in violence and sexual offences, which surged by 114.3% from 21 to 45 incidents. This jump is particularly concerning given the category’s 36% above the UK average, with 3.2 crimes per 1,000 residents. Public order offences also saw a 100% increase, rising from 3 to 6, while shoplifting doubled from 2 to 4 incidents. These shifts suggest a notable deterioration in community safety during February. The crime mix has tilted sharply towards violent and disorderly conduct, with property crimes accounting for only 26.9% of the total. This imbalance may reflect seasonal factors, such as reduced outdoor activity driving more indoor gatherings and conflicts. Anti-social behaviour, at 1.6 per 1,000 residents, is 65% above the UK average, indicating a significant local challenge. Conversely, public order offences are 9% below the UK average, which could be attributed to effective local policing or community initiatives. Shoplifting, while rising sharply, remains 52% below the UK average, due to the area’s limited retail presence compared to other urban centres. Residents may find the doubling of shoplifting incidents particularly relevant, as it could signal increased opportunistic crime in local stores. The data underscores the need for targeted interventions in violence prevention and anti-social behaviour management, given their disproportionate impact on the area’s crime profile.

February 2025’s crime rate of 7.3 per 1,000 residents represents a 48.6% increase from the previous month’s rate of 4.9, highlighting a sharp upward trend. This rise places the area’s crime profile in stark contrast to the UK average, with the overall rate remaining 9% higher than the national figure. On a daily basis, the area experienced an average of 4 crimes per day in February—a figure that, while modest, reflects the concentrated nature of reported incidents. Over the course of the month, 1 crime was reported for every 136 residents, a monthly exposure rate that underscores the frequency of incidents within a relatively small population. When scaled to the area’s population of 14,160, this means that over 100 residents experienced a crime during February. The comparison to the previous month is particularly striking, as the jump in violent crimes and anti-social behaviour suggests a sudden escalation in local tensions. This increase could be influenced by the area’s built-up nature, where higher population density may amplify the impact of isolated incidents. The daily crime count, while low in absolute terms, may be perceived as significant by residents due to the clustering of incidents in specific locations or times. The 1-in-136 monthly exposure rate provides a concrete measure of risk, though it is essential to contextualise this within the broader UK framework, where similar rates are not explicitly provided. The data invites further analysis of how local factors, such as community engagement or policing strategies, might influence these figures compared to the national average.