Rutland Crime Rate December 2023 | Monthly Statistics

In December 2023, Rutland maintained a crime rate of 3.7 per 1,000 residents, placing it 48.6% below the UK average of 7.2 per 1,000. This figure highlights the area’s relative safety, though it is important to contextualise the numbers within Rutland’s specific characteristics. As a largely rural district, the crime profile reflects patterns typical of low-density areas, where property crimes and antisocial behaviour often dominate. Violence and sexual offences accounted for 43.9% of all reported crimes, the highest single category, yet this rate remains 39% below the UK average. Seasonal factors may have influenced this distribution: with December marked by Christmas shopping, shorter daylight hours, and the presence of empty homes during holiday absences, the local crime picture aligns with broader seasonal trends. However, Rutland’s data shows no sharp spikes in retail-related offences, a contrast to urban centres where festive periods often see increased theft and public order incidents. The lower overall rate may be partly attributable to the area’s smaller population and lower population density, which can reduce opportunities for certain types of crime. Property crimes such as vehicle crime and burglary are also significantly below UK averages, with vehicle crime at 0.4 per 1,000 (11% below the UK rate) and burglary at 0.1 per 1,000 (71% below). These figures suggest that Rutland’s geographical and demographic profile—likely characterised by spacious residential areas and limited commercial hubs—may contribute to its lower crime rates compared to more densely populated regions. The absence of major retail or entertainment districts may further explain the relatively low incidence of shoplifting and public order offences, which are typically concentrated in urban or tourist-heavy areas. While the overall crime rate remains stable, the breakdown of crime types illustrates a balance between violent and property offences that is distinct from national patterns, offering a nuanced view of local safety.

December saw an 112.5% increase in other thefts, rising from eight to seventeen incidents. This surge, though still below the UK average of 0.6 per 1,000, raises questions about potential seasonal factors such as holiday gift shopping or increased indoor activity during darker evenings. Bicycle theft also doubled to one incident, a rare but notable spike that may reflect the movement of personal property during festive travel. Conversely, public order offences decreased by 38.5%, from thirteen to eight, possibly linked to reduced public gatherings during the Christmas period. Violence and sexual offences, which made up 43.9% of all crimes, remained 39% below the UK average of 2.6 per 1,000. This gap suggests Rutland’s community dynamics—influenced by its rural character—may contribute to lower levels of violent crime compared to more densely populated areas. A resident might find the 1-in-267 monthly exposure figure particularly relevant, as it provides a tangible measure of risk in a local context.

Rutland's crime rate remained stable at 3.7 per 1,000 residents in December 2023, matching the rate from November. This consistency suggests no significant shift in overall criminal activity during the month. On a daily basis, the area experienced approximately five reported crimes each day, a figure that, while low, reflects the persistent nature of local crime patterns. Over the course of the month, one reported crime occurred for roughly every 267 residents, illustrating that the risk of experiencing a crime is relatively low compared to national averages. With Rutland’s population of 41,443, this monthly exposure translates to a 0.0024 probability of being directly affected by a crime, a statistic that contextualises the scale of risk for individuals living in the area. The stability in crime rates contrasts with seasonal expectations, as December typically sees spikes in retail-related offences due to festive shopping and holiday gatherings. However, Rutland’s data shows no such increase, possibly due to the area’s smaller population and lower foot traffic in retail hubs compared to larger urban centres.