Stocksbridge Crime Rate July 2024 | Monthly Statistics

For a population of 7,682 residents, Stocksbridge recorded 66 crimes in July 2024, translating to a crime rate of 8.6 per 1,000 people. This places the area 2.4% above the UK average of 8.4 per 1,000. The most common crime type was violence and sexual offences (19 incidents, 28.8% of total), followed by public order offences (10 incidents, 15.2%) and anti-social behaviour (8 incidents, 12.1%). These patterns align with the summer season, when increased social activity and events in the area may contribute to higher levels of public disorder. Violence rates in Stocksbridge were 12% below the UK average, suggesting local factors such as community policing or social initiatives may temper more severe crimes. Conversely, public order offences were starkly elevated, with rates 103% above the national average—a figure that could reflect the impact of festivals, outdoor events, and the absence of school terms, which often correlate with spikes in disorderly conduct. While property crimes (24 incidents) accounted for 36% of total offences, the distribution across categories highlights a combination of community dynamics and seasonal influences. The area’s built-up character within Sheffield, with its mix of residential and commercial spaces, likely contributes to this profile, though further analysis would be needed to confirm specific correlations.

July 2024 saw significant month-on-month changes in specific crime categories. Burglary increased by 150% (from 2 to 5 incidents), a sharp rise that may be linked to summer holidays creating opportunities for opportunistic theft. Public order offences also surged by 150%, jumping from 4 to 10 incidents—a trend consistent with the area’s summer festival calendar and extended evening activity. Possession of weapons rose by 100%, with two reported cases, though this remains a relatively low figure compared to the UK average. In contrast, other crime fell by 75% (from 4 to 1 incident), and drugs offences dropped by 50% (from 4 to 2), potentially reflecting seasonal shifts in illicit activity or targeted policing efforts. The breakdown of crime types reveals a stark contrast with national trends: while violence rates were 12% below the UK average, public order offences were 103% above, and burglary rates were 126% above the national average. These disparities suggest that local factors—such as the presence of community spaces, event venues, or specific policing strategies—are shaping Stocksbridge’s crime profile in ways that diverge from broader patterns. For residents, the spike in public order offences may be a particular concern, as these incidents often involve noise complaints, anti-social behaviour, and disturbances that impact daily life.

Compared to June 2024, when the crime rate stood at 8.9 per 1,000 residents, Stocksbridge’s July rate fell by 2.9%, indicating a slight overall decline. This reduction is most evident in the daily crime context: 66 crimes over 31 days equate to roughly 2 crimes per day, a figure that may appear manageable for a small built-up area. On a monthly scale, the rate of 1 crime per 116 residents highlights the relatively low frequency of incidents for the population size, though this figure does not account for variations in reporting or local policing effectiveness. When compared to the UK average, Stocksbridge’s crime rate remains slightly elevated, but the composition of offences tells a different story. For instance, while burglary rates are 126% above the national average, violence rates are 12% below, suggesting that the area’s crime challenges are not uniformly aligned with national trends. This divergence may stem from Stocksbridge’s specific socio-economic profile, with its mix of industrial heritage and modern residential areas. Residents might find the monthly exposure figure—1-in-116 residents experiencing a crime—particularly relevant, as it contextualizes the impact of crime within the community. However, the sharp increase in public order offences and burglary raises questions about whether targeted interventions or environmental factors are contributing to these trends, warranting closer attention from local authorities.