South Cambridgeshire Crime Rate September 2025 | Monthly Statistics

South Cambridgeshire's crime rate in September 2025 stood at 4.9 per 1,000 residents, placing it 33.8% below the UK average of 7.4 per 1,000. This figure reflects a consistently lower-than-average crime profile for the area, which aligns with its character as a largely rural district with significant urban centres such as Cambridge, where public services and infrastructure contribute to a visible police presence. The most prevalent crime category was violence and sexual offences, accounting for 35.2% of total incidents, followed by anti-social behaviour (17.9%) and criminal damage and arson (8.1%). These patterns are consistent with the area's mix of academic and residential populations, where university campuses and densely populated neighbourhoods may contribute to higher rates of violent incidents. Seasonal context also plays a role: September typically sees a return to structured routines after summer, yet the transition to term-time activities may have influenced the distribution of crime types. Violent crime rates in the area (1.7 per 1,000) were 34% below the UK average, suggesting effective community engagement or policing strategies in managing such incidents. However, the relatively high rate of burglary (0.4 per 1,000) — 43% above the UK average — indicates specific vulnerabilities in property security that warrant further attention. The overall crime picture illustrates a balance between proactive community measures and persistent challenges in targeted areas.

September 2025 saw significant fluctuations in specific crime categories, with theft from the person surging by 300% (from 1 to 4 incidents) — a stark increase that may reflect heightened vulnerability during the transition back to academic schedules. Concurrently, drug-related offences rose by 106.7% (from 15 to 31), potentially linked to seasonal shifts in illicit activity or increased policing focus on specific hotspots. Burglary also climbed by 55.8% (from 43 to 67), marking the most substantial month-on-month increase across all categories. This rise contrasts with declines in other areas: robbery fell by 40% (from 5 to 3), due to enhanced security measures around high-traffic zones, while vehicle crime dropped by 32.7% (from 49 to 33), a trend consistent with reduced summer-related opportunistic theft. The breakdown of crime types also reveals notable disparities compared to the UK average. Violence and sexual offences remained 34% below the national rate, yet burglary (43% above UK average) and possession of weapons (43% above UK average) highlight specific vulnerabilities. These trends suggest that while overall crime remains subdued, targeted interventions may be needed for property-related offences, particularly in areas with higher concentrations of residential properties or unsecured premises.

The crime rate in South Cambridgeshire for September 2025 (4.9 per 1,000) marked a 4.7% increase from the previous month's rate of 4.7 per 1,000, indicating a slight upward trend in reported incidents. This shift, though modest, underscores the dynamic nature of local crime patterns. On a daily basis, the area experienced approximately 28 crimes per day — a figure that, while seemingly high, is distributed across a population of 172,544 residents. Over the course of the month, this translated to one reported crime for every 205 residents, a statistic that provides context for residents assessing their personal risk. When viewed against the UK average, South Cambridgeshire's overall rate remains significantly lower, but the comparison also reveals the need for targeted improvements in specific areas. For instance, burglary's 43% above the UK average highlights a critical discrepancy that may require tailored strategies, such as community education on home security or enhanced police patrols in vulnerable neighbourhoods. Conversely, the area's performance in categories like anti-social behaviour (23% below UK average) and shoplifting (67% below UK average) suggests that existing measures in these domains are effective. This nuanced comparison illustrates the importance of maintaining a balance between celebrating progress in lower-risk categories and addressing persistent challenges in others.