Great Wyrley and Cheslyn Hay Crime Rate August 2025 | Monthly Statistics

The balance between property and violent crime in Great Wyrley and Cheslyn Hay during August 2025 reveals a distinct pattern. With a total crime rate of 3.9 per 1,000 residents—51.9% below the UK average of 8.1—the area remains significantly safer than the national average. However, the distribution of crime types shows a marked dominance of violent crime over property crime. Violence and sexual offences accounted for 41.9% of all reported crimes, far exceeding the share of property crimes (29.1%), which includes 18 incidents of theft, burglary, and vehicle crime. This shift may reflect local factors such as community dynamics or seasonal activity patterns. August, as a peak holiday month, typically sees increased tourism and transient populations, which could contribute to higher rates of violent incidents in public spaces. Anti-social behaviour also featured prominently, comprising 14.5% of crimes, suggesting ongoing challenges in maintaining public order during busy periods. While property crime rates remain below UK averages—particularly for shoplifting (52% below national levels)—the relatively higher proportion of violent crime compared to property crime raises questions about the interplay between local demographics and environmental factors. The area’s built-up nature within South Staffordshire likely influences these patterns, with mixed-use spaces increasing exposure to both public order issues and interpersonal conflicts. Seasonal factors, such as the influx of visitors during August, may also play a role in amplifying violent crime rates relative to property crime, which often correlates more closely with fixed residential populations.

August 2025 saw notable shifts in crime patterns, with violent crime dominating over property crime. The rate of violence and sexual offences (1.6 per 1,000) was 44% below the UK average, yet it remained the most common category, accounting for 41.9% of all reported crimes. This contrasted with property crime, which included 18 incidents but accounted for only 29.1% of the total. Among month-on-month changes, three categories saw 100% increases: other crime (from 0 to 1), public order (from 3 to 6), and robbery (from 0 to 1). These spikes could indicate emerging issues or underreporting in previous months. Conversely, criminal damage and arson fell by 87.5% (from 8 to 1), and burglary dropped by 60% (from 5 to 2), potentially reflecting seasonal factors or targeted interventions. Vehicle crime, at 0.4 per 1,000, was 3% above the UK average, suggesting local vulnerabilities such as commuter parking or retail areas. For residents, the 100% increase in public order offences may signal heightened concerns about noise, anti-social behaviour, or disruptions in communal spaces. The data also highlights a broader trend: while the area is safer than the UK average, the relative prevalence of violent crime compared to property crime merits further scrutiny in relation to local social and environmental conditions.

The crime rate in August 2025 (3.9 per 1,000) marked a 20.5% decline from the previous month’s rate of 4.9 per 1,000, reflecting a sustained downward trend. On a daily basis, the area recorded approximately 2 crimes per day over the 31-day period, a figure that aligns with the low overall rate and suggests a manageable level of activity for residents. When scaled to the population of 15,998, the monthly exposure translates to roughly one reported crime for every 258 residents, a statistic that underscores the area’s comparative safety. This monthly aggregate, while not directly comparable to UK-wide figures (as no daily or monthly UK-wide equivalent exists), aligns with the broader trend of being 51.9% below the UK average. The population context further highlights the significance of these numbers: in an area of 16,000 residents, the crime rate remains exceptionally low, particularly when compared to the UK’s 8.1 per 1,000. However, the persistent gap between property and violent crime—despite both being below UK averages—raises questions about local risk factors. For instance, the 3% above-average rate for vehicle crime may reflect specific vulnerabilities in parking infrastructure or retail environments, whereas the 52% below-average shoplifting rate could indicate effective local deterrents. These contrasts suggest that while the area benefits from overall safety, targeted efforts may be needed to address the relatively higher proportion of violent crime compared to property crime.