Warlingham Crime Rate January 2026 | Monthly Statistics

Warlingham’s crime profile in January 2026 reveals a distinct balance between property and violent crime, shaped by the area’s characteristics as a built-up suburb within Tandridge. The overall crime rate of 4.2 per 1,000 residents places the area 38.2% below the UK average of 6.8 per 1,000, highlighting a generally safer environment compared to national trends. The most prevalent crime types were property-related, with burglary accounting for 26.5% of all incidents (9 cases) and other theft contributing another 14.7% (5 cases). Violent crimes, while lower in volume (7 cases or 20.6% of the total), still represented a significant share, reflecting the area’s mix of residential and commercial activity. Seasonal context suggests that January’s post-holiday period and reduced retail footfall may have influenced crime patterns, particularly in property crime categories. However, the sharp contrast between Warlingham’s burglary rate and the UK average—293% higher—raises questions about local factors, such as housing stock vulnerabilities or targeted criminal activity. This divergence underscores the need to consider area-specific dynamics when interpreting crime data, rather than relying solely on national comparisons. The relatively low rates of shoplifting (82% below UK average) and public order offences (76% below UK average) may indicate effective community policing or a lower concentration of nightlife activity compared to larger urban centres. This crime mix illustrates a suburban area where property crime remains a priority, but violent crime is proportionally lower, likely reflecting Warlingham’s demographic and geographic profile as a commuter-focused, low-density built-up area.

January 2026 saw significant fluctuations in specific crime categories, with burglary experiencing a 200% increase from 3 to 9 cases. This surge, coupled with a 150% rise in other theft (2 to 5 cases) and a 100% jump in vehicle crime (0 to 3 cases), signals a notable shift in criminal activity patterns. These increases contrast sharply with substantial declines in anti-social behaviour (50% reduction from 10 to 5 cases) and public order offences (83.3% drop from 6 to 1 case), suggesting targeted interventions or seasonal factors may have influenced these changes. The burglary rate in Warlingham—1.1 per 1,000 residents—was 293% above the UK average of 0.3 per 1,000, a stark anomaly that may reflect local vulnerabilities such as older housing stock or unsecured properties. Conversely, violent crime rates (0.9 per 1,000) were 64% below the UK average (2.5 per 1,000), aligning with the area’s character as a low-density, suburban environment with fewer concentrated points of interaction that could escalate into violence. For residents, the sharp rise in burglary is a critical concern, with the 9 incidents representing nearly a quarter of all crimes recorded in the month. This suggests a need for increased awareness around home security measures, particularly during the post-holiday period when property crime often spikes due to temporary absences or reduced vigilance.

Warlingham’s crime rate in January 2026 (4.2 per 1,000) marked a 12.8% decrease from the previous month’s rate of 4.8 per 1,000, indicating a downward trend in overall criminal activity. On a daily basis, the area recorded approximately 1 crime per day over the 31-day period, a figure that, when scaled to the population of 8,172 residents, translates to one reported crime occurring for roughly every 240 residents over the course of the month. This monthly exposure rate, while seemingly low, must be contextualised within the area’s demographic profile as a commuter-focused suburb with limited commercial density compared to larger urban centres. The 12.8% month-on-month decline aligns with typical seasonal patterns, as January’s shorter daylight hours and reduced retail footfall may have discouraged outdoor crimes. However, the stark divergence in specific categories—such as burglary (293% above UK average) and violence (64% below UK average)—highlights the importance of localised analysis. While Warlingham’s overall rate is significantly lower than the national average, the concentration of certain crime types suggests that targeted policing or community initiatives may be necessary to address vulnerabilities. For instance, the UK average for burglary (0.3 per 1,000) is 30 times lower than Warlingham’s rate, implying that local factors such as property density or socioeconomic conditions may play a role. This comparison underscores the complexity of interpreting crime data without considering the unique characteristics of each area, as national averages can mask significant regional variations.