Grove Crime Rate January 2026 | Monthly Statistics

Grove’s overall crime rate in January 2026 stood at 5.3 per 1,000 residents, 22.1% below the UK average of 6.8. This rate, while modest, reflects the area’s built-up character and limited commercial activity, which may influence the distribution of crime types. Violent crimes dominated the local crime profile, accounting for 67.4% of all incidents, significantly higher than the UK average for this category. This overrepresentation of violent offences, including 33 reported cases of violence and sexual offences, contrasts with the lower rates of property crimes such as burglary (2 incidents) and other theft (3 incidents). The seasonal context of January—a post-holiday period with reduced retail footfall and shorter daylight hours—likely contributed to the lower frequency of outdoor crimes. However, the compact nature of Grove’s built-up area may amplify the impact of violent incidents, which are more concentrated in smaller communities. Anti-social behaviour, at 4 incidents (8.2% of total), was 57% below the UK average, suggesting that local policing efforts or community engagement strategies may be effective in curbing such disturbances. Other crime categories, such as public order offences (3 incidents), also remained below national averages. These patterns indicate that while Grove is generally safer than the UK average, the localised concentration of violent crime necessitates targeted interventions. The data also highlights the importance of understanding regional differences in crime dynamics, as factors such as population density, land use, and policing priorities can shape the crime profile in ways that diverge from broader national trends.

January 2026 saw dramatic shifts in specific crime categories, with robbery, other crime, and burglary each doubling from their December 2025 figures—a 100% increase in each case. This surge, though small in absolute terms, underscores a notable change in the local crime profile. Conversely, criminal damage and arson plummeted by 80%, from five incidents to one, suggesting a potential reduction in vandalism during the post-holiday period. Violent crimes, which accounted for 67.4% of all reported incidents, remained 44% above the UK average, highlighting a local overrepresentation of such offences. This discrepancy may be influenced by factors such as the built-up area’s density or seasonal patterns, though further analysis would be needed to confirm. For residents, the sharp rise in robbery—a crime type typically associated with targeted incidents—could signal a need for heightened awareness in specific locations, such as high-traffic areas or late-night venues. The increase in other crime, which includes unclassified incidents, may reflect reporting inconsistencies or shifts in police categorization. Meanwhile, the drop in criminal damage and arson aligns with seasonal patterns, as post-holiday periods often see fewer acts of vandalism. The area’s compact built-up nature may also contribute to a higher concentration of violent incidents compared to larger urban centres, where property crimes are more evenly distributed.

Grove’s crime rate in January 2026 remained stable at 5.3 per 1,000 residents, matching the same figure recorded in December 2025. This consistency suggests no immediate shift in overall crime trends, though localized fluctuations in specific categories may still occur. On a daily basis, the area saw approximately 2 crimes reported each day in January, a figure that, while low, reflects the small population of 9,172 residents. Over the course of the month, one reported crime occurred for roughly every 187 residents, a monthly exposure rate that places Grove well below the UK average. This figure is particularly meaningful for local residents, as it illustrates the relatively low frequency of crime within the built-up area compared to the national context. The population-scaled perspective also highlights that Grove’s crime profile remains distinct from broader UK patterns, with violent crimes overrepresented in the local data despite the area’s overall safety. This contrast may be influenced by local factors such as community dynamics or specific policing strategies. The built-up area’s compact nature and limited commercial activity could contribute to a higher proportion of violent incidents relative to property crimes, which are often more dispersed in larger urban centres. This dynamic warrants further exploration, but the data underscores a unique local context that diverges from national trends.