The relationship between a village's proximity to larger towns and its crime rate is complex. While it might seem logical that being near larger urban areas would increase crime, Braunston presents a compelling case where this isn't necessarily the outcome. Braunston, a built-up area (BUA) in West Northamptonshire with a population of 1848, demonstrates this. Its crime rate stands at 29.7 incidents per 1,000 residents, a substantial difference compared to the UK national average of 91.6 per 1,000. This translates to a significantly safer environment for residents.
It's true that larger towns often attract criminal activity due to factors like greater opportunity for crime and potentially more transient populations. However, Braunston's distance and distinct community character likely mitigate some of these influences. The village benefits from a strong sense of community, which frequently acts as a deterrent to crime. Residents often look out for one another, creating a safer and more secure environment.
Furthermore, Braunston’s safety score is an impressive 92 out of 100, far exceeding the UK average of 79. This high score reflects a perception of safety among residents, supported by the low crime statistics. While the data does not explicitly detail how proximity to larger towns impacts Braunston's specific safety score, it’s reasonable to assume that factors such as local policing strategies, community engagement, and the village's physical layout all play a role. It’s important to note that crime statistics represent reported incidents and may not capture the full picture of all criminal activity. Nonetheless, the available data paints a reassuring picture of Braunston’s safety profile despite its location relative to larger settlements. The lower crime rate and high safety score suggest that the village effectively manages any potential risks associated with its proximity to larger towns.